The Research Standard
The four tenets rest on peer-reviewed institutional research that makes the investor case.
More than 230 peer-reviewed papers, official data series, and institutional reports across NBER, the IMF, OECD, the World Bank, the BIS, the SEC, ILPA, MSCI, Harvard, Stanford, and dozens of other primary sources, spanning the four tenets of The SAVI Capital Model and the extended cross-cluster evidence base that backs every Perspectives analysis.
The governance question that serious fiduciaries ask is not whether an investment manager holds values. It is whether those values are supported by evidence. The research below underpins each of the four tenets as encoded in fund document legal terms. Every citation is present in the institutional due diligence materials available to qualified reviewers.
Tenet One
Equitable Profit-Sharing
The investor case for shared economic ownership rests on a documented base of research demonstrating that profit-sharing structures reduce turnover, increase productivity, and produce more durable operational performance. The papers below establish the empirical foundation for Tenet 1.
Creating A Bigger Pie?
Robust empirical evidence from thousands of employees showing that shared capitalist practices, profit sharing, employee ownership, and stock options, reduce turnover, enhance loyalty, and spur worker effort, particularly when integrated with high-performance work policies.
View source ↗Does Profit Sharing Affect Productivity?
Investigates whether profit-sharing schemes boost firm productivity. Direct productivity effects are modest, but indirect effects on worker morale and turnover materially contribute to a stable, motivated workforce.
View source ↗The Effects of Mandatory Profit-Sharing
A natural experiment from France demonstrating that mandatory profit sharing significantly increases total worker compensation without reducing base wages, and without adverse effects on productivity, investment, or firm performance.
View source ↗Do Workers Gain by Sharing?
Shared capitalism compensation systems are linked to enhanced decision-making participation, better supervision and training, increased job security, improved pay and benefits, and higher job satisfaction, provided complementary workplace policies are in place.
View source ↗Profit Sharing Boosts Employee Productivity and Satisfaction
Broad-based profit sharing, tied to team and organizational performance, substantially boosts employee productivity and satisfaction. Informal peer monitoring and a shared sense of ownership align incentives with firm performance and counter free-rider concerns.
View source ↗Can Profit Sharing Address Income Inequality?
Approximately 35% of U.S. workers already benefit from profit sharing. Empirical evidence shows the practice raises total compensation and increases productivity by aligning workers' incentives with company performance, making it an effective tool for distributing economic growth more equitably.
View source ↗Huawei: A Case Study of When Profit Sharing Works
Huawei's Employee Stock Ownership Plan, rooted in principles of equality and performance-based rewards, drives equitable wealth distribution, boosts engagement, and fosters long-term innovation, demonstrating that profit-sharing models can scale globally with appropriate adaptations.
View source ↗Managing Without Managers
Documents Semco's transformation into one of Brazil's most innovative companies through complete transparency, democratic decision-making, and profit sharing. Treating all employees as responsible adults dismantles traditional hierarchies, boosts morale, and drives productivity.
View source ↗Research on Employee Ownership
Compiles meta-analyses and empirical studies showing that ESOPs and similar broad-based ownership arrangements are associated with better firm performance, lower turnover, greater employment stability, and improved retirement security for workers.
View source ↗S Corporation ESOPs Advantages in an Uncertain Economy
Survey evidence that S Corporation ESOP companies enjoy significantly lower quit rates, enhanced retirement security with substantially higher account balances, and stronger workforce stability than non-ESOP firms.
View source ↗Employee Ownership in the U.S. Food System During COVID-19
ESOP food companies outperformed comparable firms during the pandemic, retaining more stable workforces, offering superior benefits, and achieving higher revenue growth, empirical evidence that employee ownership enhances organizational resilience in crisis conditions.
View source ↗S Corporation ESOPs and Retirement Security
Rigorous survey of 39 S Corporation ESOPs covering 61,020 participants. Employee-owners hold more than twice the retirement savings of national averages, even among lower-wage workers, alongside markedly lower turnover that contributes to sustained long-term ROI.
View source ↗Employee Ownership by the Numbers
Quantifies the U.S. ESOP landscape: 6,548 ESOPs covering nearly 15 million participants holding more than $1.8 trillion in assets. ESOPs paid out over $156 billion and received over $107 billion in contributions in 2022, evidencing the scale and economic significance of profit-sharing through employee ownership.
View source ↗Tokenisation of Assets and Distributed Ledger Technologies in Financial Markets
Explains fractionalisation of high-value assets into digital tokens with automation-driven distribution and settlement.
View source ↗ILPA Principles 3.0: Fostering Transparency, Governance and Alignment of Interests for General and Limited Partners
Establishes the limited-partner consent and governance-document mechanism that makes encoded fund terms enforceable.
View source ↗Research on Employee Ownership and Corporate Performance
Synthesizes evidence that employee-ownership firms outperform non-owner peers and show lower turnover.
View source ↗Titre II: Participation aux résultats de l'entreprise (L3321-1 à L3326-2)
The statutory French programme mandating profit-sharing in firms of at least fifty employees referenced for Tenet 1.
View source ↗Institute for the Study of Employee Ownership and Profit Sharing
Home of the Blasi and Kruse shared-capitalism research program underpinning the Empirical Case findings.
View source ↗How Does Shared Capitalism Affect Economic Performance in the UK?
The scholarly study behind the HBR piece, linking profit-sharing and employee share ownership to firm productivity in UK WERS data.
View source ↗Accredited Investors (Rule 501 of Regulation D)
Defines the Rule 501 accredited-investor and entity thresholds that tokenized private placements must satisfy.
View source ↗Updated Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach to Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers
Global AML/CFT, customer-due-diligence and travel-rule standard underpinning wallet-level KYC and AML controls.
View source ↗Blueprint for the Future Monetary System: Improving the Old, Enabling the New
Argues tokenisation removes the siloed separation of messaging, reconciliation and settlement into one integrated platform.
View source ↗Tokenisation in the Context of Money and Other Assets: Concepts and Implications for Central Banks
Explains programmable token arrangements that embed rules across the end-to-end asset lifecycle.
View source ↗Towards an Efficient and Integrated Digital Capital Market in Europe: The Role of Tokenisation
Details DLT-based collateral eligibility, on-chain settlement and onboarding of real-world instruments.
View source ↗Tokenization of Financial Assets
Reviews how tokenised real-world assets are collateralised and supervised under existing regulatory frameworks.
View source ↗Tenet Two
Fair and Transparent Compensation
The fiduciary case for pay-ratio discipline rests on research demonstrating that excessive executive compensation reflects managerial power rather than superior performance, and that capped, transparent compensation structures align leadership incentives with long-horizon institutional health.
CEO Pay Declined in 2023
From 1978 to 2023, CEO pay rose by over 1,085% while typical worker pay grew only 24%. CEOs were paid 290 times as much as the typical worker in 2023. EPI argues this disparity reflects managerial power and rent extraction, not superior performance, supporting the case for codified pay-ratio discipline.
View source ↗E&S Metrics in Executive Remuneration: North America and Europe
European companies reach 70% inclusion of environmental and social metrics in variable pay compared to 39% in North America. Linking executive compensation to long-term sustainability metrics serves as an indirect mechanism for moderating excessive CEO-to-worker pay ratios.
View source ↗ESG Contests: Activism's Holy Grail or Side Show?
ESG themes are increasingly used in activist proxy contests to challenge corporate governance, including excessive executive compensation. Growing investor pressure for executive pay tied to long-term sustainable performance reinforces the case for codified ratio constraints.
View source ↗Why Pay Transparency Regulations Are a Strategic Management Opportunity
Embracing both distributive and procedural transparency demystifies pay-setting and addresses inequities. Organizations can restrain excessive CEO compensation by making decision processes clear, accountable, and aligned with long-term performance.
View source ↗Will Salary Transparency Laws Change Employee Compensation?
Mandated disclosure of pay ranges may shift compensation into bonuses and other nonreportable forms. Transparency can serve as a critical lever for moderating excessive CEO compensation and enhancing pay equity, with effects depending on how firms balance reported and nonreported elements.
View source ↗E&S Metrics in Executive Remuneration: A Focus on North America and Europe
Source for the seventy percent Europe versus thirty-nine percent North America figures on E&S-linked executive pay.
View source ↗Intermediate Sanctions (IRC Section 4958) — Excess Benefit Transactions and Reasonable Compensation
Source for the IRS reasonable-compensation standard governing nonprofit executive pay multiples.
View source ↗A Model of Private Equity Fund Compensation
Models how PE management compensation is structured around exits, supporting the LBO ratchet and exit-linked compensation claim.
View source ↗Executive Compensation and Governance Research
Anchors the managerial-power capture thesis and the cultural-signaling function of executive compensation structures.
View source ↗G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023
Supports the cross-jurisdiction drift toward moderated executive remuneration aligned with strategy and sustainability metrics.
View source ↗Private Fund Advisers; Documentation of Registered Investment Adviser Compliance Reviews (Final Rule)
Supports the legal architecture of limited-partner ratification and enforcement of private-fund governance terms.
View source ↗Executive Paywatch
Independent corroboration of the S&P 500 CEO-to-worker pay ratio near the cited baseline.
View source ↗Global Private Equity Report
Bain industry report tracking the rising share of deal value flowing through co-investment structures.
View source ↗Global Private Markets Report 2024: Private Markets in a Slower Era
Establishes how conventional return theses depend on leverage, multiple expansion, and deployment pacing rather than governance compatibility.
View source ↗G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023
Frames disclosure, transparency, and board responsibility toward stakeholders as the baseline governance standard the model treats as primary operating data.
View source ↗ICGN Global Governance Principles
Defines continuous board accountability to shareholders and stakeholders, supporting governance as an operating standard rather than quarterly oversight.
View source ↗Pay Ratio Disclosure (Final Rule implementing Dodd-Frank Section 953(b))
Establishes the regulatory CEO-to-median-worker pay-ratio disclosure regime against which the Tenet 2 fifteen-to-one to twenty-to-one ceiling is benchmarked.
View source ↗Executive Paywatch: CEO-to-Worker Pay Ratios
Supplies empirical S&P 500 CEO-to-worker pay-ratio data (averaging 285-to-1) that frames how far the Tenet 2 ceiling departs from prevailing practice.
View source ↗Tenet Three
Ethical and Principled Stewardship
The investor case for principled stewardship rests on research demonstrating that ESG integration produces lower capital costs, enhanced risk mitigation, and superior long-term risk-adjusted returns. The papers below establish the empirical foundation for Tenet 3.
Are Firms and Managers At Risk When Contributing to Climate Change?
Documents emerging legal and reputational accountability for firms and executives contributing to environmental harm. Strong ESG frameworks reduce capital costs, support market valuations, and constrain long-term financial and litigation risk.
View source ↗Rethinking Executive Incentives Can Boost ESG Performance
Introduces 'parity pills', contractual clauses that trigger executive compensation redistribution during downturns. Aligns leadership decisions with long-term ESG objectives, safeguards employees during adverse conditions, and enhances market valuations.
View source ↗Why Business Integrity Can Be a Strategic Response to Ethical Challenges
Integrating business integrity into corporate governance, through independent oversight, cross-functional collaboration, and employee engagement, mitigates reputational and operational risks, lowers capital costs, and enhances market performance.
View source ↗The MSCI Principles of Sustainable Investing
ESG integration materially affects asset pricing, cost of capital, and long-term financial performance. Sustainable investing is not a niche but a fundamental component of portfolio construction and risk management, producing lower capital costs and improved risk-adjusted returns.
View source ↗2025 Sustainability and Climate Trends Paper
Sustainability and climate data identify firms that are more competitive, more profitable, and less exposed to long-term risks. Integrating sustainability into asset allocation and risk management reveals investment opportunities while mitigating long-horizon ESG risks.
View source ↗Sustainable Market Share Index
Sustainability-marketed products grew to 18.5% market share with a 5-year CAGR of 9.9%, contributing roughly one-third of CPG growth. Demonstrates that embedding ESG principles into business strategy creates long-term value and resilience even under inflationary and market pressure.
View source ↗Unleashing Sustainable Value in Food & Agriculture
Using ROSI™ methodology, demonstrates that integrating sustainability across the food value chain, from processors to retailers, drives revenue growth, cost reductions, and supply chain resilience. ESG integration is a strategic driver of enduring business value, not a compliance exercise.
View source ↗Capco Journal #56
Examines impact funds and ESG strategies. Only a select group of funds deliver measurable impact through thorough ESG integration. Genuine ESG practices, not mere labels, are essential for long-term sustainable value creation and stakeholder trust.
View source ↗ILPA Principles 3.0: Fostering Transparency, Governance and Alignment of Interests for General and Limited Partners
The institutional benchmark for LP-protective fund terms named throughout the essay (fee offsets, carry waterfalls, key-person, LPAC consent, GP commitment percentage).
View source ↗An Inconvenient Fact: Private Equity Returns and the Billionaire Factory
Documents the distributional consequences of carry and fee structures that let GPs extract economics before the full portfolio matures, anchoring the clawback/escrow argument.
View source ↗Preqin Special Report: Private Capital Fund Terms
Benchmarks the actual strength of individual LP terms versus headline characterizations across thousands of funds, supporting the LP-friendly drift argument.
View source ↗Global Private Equity Report 2026: Private Equity Outlook, Gaining Traction
Shows LP satisfaction now tracks distribution delivery and term specificity rather than overall fund characterization, supporting the provision-level evaluation thesis.
View source ↗Alignment of General and Limited Partner Interests in PE Funds
Documents the structural principal-agent gap between GP characterizations and contractual covenants, supporting the encoded-versus-aspirational alignment distinction.
View source ↗Commission Interpretation Regarding Standard of Conduct for Investment Advisers
Establishes the adviser fiduciary duty of care and loyalty that frames stewardship as a contractual obligation rather than a stated intention.
View source ↗Commission Interpretation: Standard of Conduct for Investment Advisers
Confirms the SEC adviser fiduciary duties of care and loyalty and that they cannot be fully waived, grounding the same-enforcement-authority argument.
View source ↗Asset Manager Code
Codifies the duty to act for the benefit of clients with independence and full disclosure, supporting stewardship as a verifiable professional obligation.
View source ↗Principles for Responsible Investment
Anchors the responsible-investment and stewardship framework against which fund-level stewardship discipline is positioned.
View source ↗Stewardship 2.0: Awareness, Effectiveness, and Progression of Stewardship Codes
Documents how comply-or-explain stewardship codes turn engagement into a verifiable standard rather than rhetoric.
View source ↗Commission Interpretation Regarding Standard of Conduct for Investment Advisers (Release IA-5248)
Grounds the fiduciary footing (duty of care and loyalty) the essay invokes for enforceable stewardship obligations.
View source ↗ICGN Global Stewardship Principles
Provides the institutional-investor stewardship framework backing the essay's governance-as-category claim.
View source ↗G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance
Supplies the governance-rights and institutional-health standards underpinning the five-to-ten-year horizon indicators.
View source ↗The UK Stewardship Code
Sets the transparency-and-reporting model the essay mirrors for cadence-based stewardship disclosure.
View source ↗MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology
The standard institutional benchmark for comparing firms along environmental, social, and governance axes referenced in the ESG contrast.
View source ↗Tenet Four
Sustainable and Social Impact
The structural case for institutional philanthropy as a distribution term rather than a discretionary commitment rests on research demonstrating that codified, transparent, values-aligned giving builds stakeholder loyalty, employee engagement, and durable brand equity that supports long-horizon enterprise value.
Community Building: The New & Old Politics of Urban Problem Solving
Examines decentralized governance, stakeholder engagement, and collective decision-making in urban problem solving. Philanthropic initiatives that empower local communities and build social capital deliver more enduring impact than top-down funding alone.
View source ↗Values-Aligned Philanthropy: Discussing Responsible Giving with Donors
Comprehensive toolkit for foundations to implement values-aligned philanthropic policies. Effective philanthropy must be grounded in clear values to ensure donations do not inadvertently support hate, extremism, or violence, and to deliver durable social impact.
View source ↗Philanthropy's New Voice: Building Trust With Deeper Stories and Clear Language
Multi-method research showing that transparent, authentic, abundance-focused storytelling builds public trust in philanthropy. Foundations must counter narrative vacuums with clear, relatable language that details how decisions are made and funds deployed.
View source ↗World Giving Index 2022
Global snapshot of charitable behavior across helping strangers, donating money, and volunteering time. Documents record levels of interpersonal aid and reinforces that effective philanthropy builds stronger, more connected societies and supports cross-border institutional giving.
View source ↗Corporate Giving 2024: The FTSE 100 and Beyond
Examines corporate giving among the UK's largest firms. Documents the decline in real-term donations despite rising profits and identifies a growing movement toward best-practice giving of at least 1% of pre-tax profits, supporting the structural case for codified philanthropic commitments.
View source ↗Effective Philanthropy
Examines foundation effectiveness through the lens of deep diversity and gender equality. Effective philanthropic strategy must institutionalize diverse perspectives to unlock organizational creativity, improve responsiveness, and deliver higher social impact.
View source ↗Private Investment Benchmarks
Net-of-fees PE benchmark data disaggregated by strategy and vintage supporting long-horizon outcome analysis.
View source ↗The State of Impact Measurement and Management Practice
Documents how the practitioner community moved from informal commitment to structured IMM reporting and names input-metric reporting as the primary barrier to credible benchmarking.
View source ↗Investing for Impact: Operating Principles for Impact Management
Distinguishes investor intent from contribution from verified outcome and requires independent verification, the standard the essay invokes for outcome-not-output metrics.
View source ↗How Impact Investors Actually Measure Impact
Maps the variety of proprietary impact-measurement methods and the absence of cross-method comparability, supporting the proxy-metric failure mode.
View source ↗New Examples of Permissible Program-Related Investments
Sets out the legally binding requirements of program-related investments, illustrating that legal obligations are more durable than voluntary philanthropic commitments.
View source ↗Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings
Finds ESG rater agreement averages about 0.61 correlation versus 0.99 for credit ratings, the exact divergence figure the essay cites against ESG-as-impact.
View source ↗MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology
States the rating measures exposure to industry-specific ESG risks and relative risk management, not social outcomes, exactly as the essay characterizes it.
View source ↗Impact Investing
NBER study of impact-fund return characteristics and the willingness to accept lower returns for social claims, supporting the attribution-gap point (replaces the non-existent w27475).
View source ↗Scaling Impact in Education for Transformative Change
Center for Universal Education work on evaluating and scaling education interventions, the in-practice illustration the essay draws for causal attribution at scale.
View source ↗Initiative for Responsible Investment
Harvard responsible-investment research program supporting the gap between self-reported and independently verified impact data.
View source ↗Sustainability in Private Equity
Bain PE sustainability practice arguing impact integration is most durable when embedded in fund governance rather than appended to marketing.
View source ↗Private Equity and Venture Capital Impact Investing Benchmark Statistics
Tracks return characteristics across dedicated impact-fund vintages, the benchmark basis for the essay's claim that credible measurement follows governance structure.
View source ↗Calculating the Value of Impact Investing
HBR analysis of the limits of impact-measurement tools, supporting the point that policy-level commitments have not produced commensurate measured outcomes.
View source ↗ILPA Principles 3.0: Fostering Transparency, Governance and Alignment of Interests for General and Limited Partners
Frames transparency as a structural LP commitment, supporting the move from trusting the operator to trusting the platform.
View source ↗AI Index Report
Authoritative source on human-centered AI that augments human judgment, grounding Sylvanus as evolution of judgment not replacement.
View source ↗Artificial Intelligence at MIT Sloan
MIT Sloan AI research hub backing the claim that machine intelligence is reshaping interaction with capital markets and finance.
View source ↗The State of AI: Global Survey
McKinsey adoption survey supports AI emerging as a new architecture and competitive intelligence layer for capital.
View source ↗AI and the Next Wave of Transformation: Global Asset Management Report 2024
BCG asset-management AI report grounding application of Sylvanus intelligence to the capital stack, GP/LP structures and allocation.
View source ↗AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
NIST framework for trustworthy, governed AI supports the claim that Sylvanus stays in harmony with its original intent while it learns.
View source ↗OECD AI Principles
OECD trustworthy human-centered AI principles support a system that flows with markets while remaining aligned to founding intent.
View source ↗Regulatory Framework for AI (AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689)
EU AI Act is the leading regime for enforceable, non-performative governance of AI deployed in capital allocation.
View source ↗Adaptive Markets: Financial Evolution at the Speed of Thought
Lo's Adaptive Markets Hypothesis grounds the framing of markets as complex, adaptive, evolutionary ecologies rather than static spreadsheets.
View source ↗Predicting Financial Market Stress with Machine Learning
BIS study shows machine learning detects financial-stress signals that rigid models miss, grounding Sylvanus energetic sensing.
View source ↗Global Family Office Report 2026
Documents how family offices increasingly write sustainability and impact mandates into allocation policy, the self-selected investor base that subscribes to an encoded redirection term.
View source ↗Legal Resources and Foundation Governance Guidance
Foundation-sector authority on how discretionary corporate-foundation policies can be funded, defunded, redirected or wound down by board resolution.
View source ↗GIIN Research
Research hub establishing long-horizon institutional capital deployment for measurable outcomes, the kind of work the Tenet 4 endowment destination funds.
View source ↗The Role of Evidence in Impact Investing
Frames impact capital as patient, evidence-anchored deployment rather than gesture, supporting the endowment as a serious long-horizon destination.
View source ↗Philanthropy and Funding
Sustains the distinction between what philanthropic capital expresses and what it structurally builds, the structural-versus-gestural axis the Tenet 4 break turns on.
View source ↗ILPA Model Limited Partnership Agreement
Neutral reference LPA showing the governing instrument that encodes the preferred return and carry split is the same instrument that would encode a tail distribution term.
View source ↗The Extended Evidence Base
Research Across the Perspectives
Every empirical and macro claim advanced across the Perspectives essays resolves to a primary source. The 140 additional studies below, drawn from the doctrine, capital-allocation, systemic-fracture, and regional analyses, are gathered here so the full evidentiary base is auditable in one place.
The SAVI Doctrine · 60 sources
AEAWEB The Rise of Income and Wealth Inequality in America: Evidence from Distributional Macroeconomic Accounts Saez, Emmanuel, and Gabriel Zucman · 2020 ↗ Aspen Business and Society Program 2026 ↗ BIS The Tokenisation Continuum Aldasoro, I., et al · 2023 ↗ BIS The Next-Generation Monetary and Financial System Bank for International Settlements · 2025 ↗ BIS BIS Quarterly Review Bank for International Settlements · 2026 ↗ BLS The K-Shaped Recovery: Examining the Diverging Fortunes of Workers in the Recovery from the COVID-19 Pandemic Dalton, M., et al · 2021 ↗ Brookings Income Inequality in the United States Kearney, Melissa S · 2014 ↗ CFA Institute Global Investment Performance Standards (GIPS) 2020 ↗ CFAINSTITUTE Asset Allocation to Alternative Investments CFA Institute · 2026 ↗ CFAINSTITUTE Research and Policy Center CFA Institute · 2025 ↗ Cambridge Associates US PE/VC Benchmark Commentary: Calendar Year 2024 2025 ↗ DELOITTE 2025 Gen Z and Millennial Survey 2025 ↗ Damodaran (NYU Stern) Private Equity: Beyond the Storytelling Aswath Damodaran · 2024 ↗ ECONPAPERS Inequality and Unsustainable Growth: Two Sides of the Same Coin? Berg, Andrew, Jonathan D. Ostry · 2011 ↗ EPI The Productivity-Pay Gap Economic Policy Institute · 2025 ↗ EPI CEO pay has skyrocketed 1,322% since 1978: CEOs were paid 351 times as much as a typical worker in 2020 Economic Policy Institute (Mishel & Kandra) · 2021 ↗ Edelman 2026 Edelman Trust Barometer 2026 ↗ Federal Reserve Distributional Financial Accounts 2025 ↗ GIIN State of the Market: Trends, Performance and Allocations 2025 ↗ HBR New Research Debunks a Common Criticism of Pay Transparency Harvard Business Review · 2025 ↗ Harvard HKS Research on Institutional Philanthropy and Endowment-Based Impact Capital Harvard Kennedy School, Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government · 2024 ↗ Harvard Law SEC Adopts CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure Rule (Dodd-Frank Section 953(b)) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · 2015 ↗ IDEAS The Performance of Socially Responsible Investments: A Meta-Analysis Hornuf, Lars and Gül Yüksel · 2022 ↗ IDEAS The Impact of Relative CEO Pay on Employee Productivity Afzali, Aaron, Lars Oxelheim, Trond Randøy and João Paulo Vieito · 2023 ↗ IDEAS Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth Ostry, Jonathan D., Andrew Berg, and Charalambos G. Tsangarides · 2014 ↗ IDEAS Geoeconomic Fragmentation and the Future of Multilateralism Aiyar, S., Ilyina, A., et al · 2023 ↗ IMF Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality: A Global Perspective Dabla-Norris, E., et al · 2015 ↗ IMF World Economic Outlook 2025 ↗ LAW 15 U.S.C. 80a-2(a)(51) — Definition of Qualified Purchaser, Investment Company Act of 1940 U.S. Congress · 1940 ↗ MIT Sloan Research on ESG Materiality, Governance Quality, and Long-Term Financial Performance 2024 ↗ MORNINGSTAR U.S. Sustainable Funds Landscape 2024 ↗ MSCI MSCI ESG Ratings 2024 ↗ MSCI ESG Ratings in Global Equity Markets: A Long-Term Performance Review 2025 ↗ McKinsey The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier 2023 ↗ McKinsey Global Economic Outlook and Geopolitical Geometry of Trade 2025 ↗ McKinsey Geopolitics and the Geometry of Global Trade 2024 ↗ McKinsey Five Ways That ESG Creates Value Henisz, Witold, Tim Koller, and Robin Nuttall · 2019 ↗ NBER Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor Acemoglu, D., and Restrepo, P · 2019 ↗ NBER The Global Decline of the Labor Share Karabarbounis, L., and Neiman, B · 2013 ↗ NBER The Economic Effects of Private Equity Buyouts Davis, Steven J., John Haltiwanger, Kyle Handley, Ben Lipsius, Josh Lerner, Javier Miranda · 2019 ↗ NBER Private Equity, Jobs, and Productivity Davis, Steven J., John Haltiwanger, Kyle Handley, Ron Jarmin, Josh Lerner, Javier Miranda · 2013 ↗ NBER Productivity and Pay: Is the Link Broken? Stansbury, Anna, Lawrence H. Summers · 2017 ↗ NBER The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting Graham, John R., Campbell R. Harvey and Shiva Rajgopal · 2004 ↗ NBER Borrow Cheap, Buy High? The Determinants of Leverage and Pricing in Buyouts Axelson, Jenkinson, Stromberg, and Weisbach · 2010 ↗ NBER High-Yield Debt Covenants and Their Real Effects Brauning, Ivashina, and Ozdagli · 2022 ↗ NBER Leveraged Buyouts and Private Equity Kaplan and Stromberg · 2008 ↗ NBER Buyouts: A Primer Jenkinson, Kim, and Weisbach · 2021 ↗ NBER Do Buyouts (Still) Create Value? Guo, Hotchkiss, and Song · 2008 ↗ NBER Wealth Inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from Capitalized Income Tax Data Saez, Emmanuel, and Gabriel Zucman · 2014 ↗ OECD Tokenisation of Assets and Distributed Ledger Technologies in Financial Markets 2025 ↗ OECD OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report March 2026 2026 ↗ OPENLIBRARY The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century Scheidel, Walter · 2017 ↗ PIIE Trade Hyperglobalization Is Dead. Long Live...? Subramanian, Arvind, Martin Kessler, and Emanuele Properzi · 2023 ↗ PRI Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century: Final Report 2019 ↗ PUBMED Building a Better America—One Wealth Quintile at a Time Norton, Michael I., and Dan Ariely · 2011 ↗ SCIENCEDIRECT Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital? El Ghoul, Sadok, Omrane Guedhami, Chuck C. Y. Kwok, and Dev R. Mishra · 2011 ↗ Stanford The 2025 AI Index Report, Chapter 4: Economy 2025 ↗ UBS Global Family Office Report 2026 2026 ↗ USSIF US Sustainable Investing Trends Report US SIF · 2025 ↗ World Bank Global Economic Prospects 2026 ↗Capital Allocation · 18 sources
CAISGROUP An Introduction to Growth Equity CAIS (Capital Integration Systems LLC) · 2025 ↗ CAMPDENWEALTH Global Family Office Report 2024 Campden Wealth · 2024 ↗ Cambridge Associates Six Things to Know About Co-investments 2019 ↗ Cambridge Associates Insights: Institutional and Family Office Investment Research 2024 ↗ EXED Building a Legacy: Family Office Wealth Management Harvard Business School · 2026 ↗ FAMILYOFFICE Private Family Capital Investment Survey Family Office Exchange · 2024 ↗ GOVINFO Privately Offered Investment Companies, Release No. IC-22405 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · 1996 ↗ INVESTOR Private Placements under Regulation D, Updated Investor Bulletin 2022 ↗ LAW 17 CFR 230.501 — Definitions and terms used in Regulation D (Rule 501, Accredited Investor) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ↗ LAW 15 U.S.C. 80a-3 — Definition of Investment Company, Sections 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7) U.S. Congress ↗ LAW 15 U.S.C. 78l(g) — Registration Requirements for Securities, Securities Exchange Act of 1934 U.S. Congress · 1934 ↗ LAW 17 CFR 270.2a51-1, Definition of Investments for Purposes of Section 2(a)(51) (Qualified Purchaser) U.S. Code of Federal Regulations ↗ NBER Private Equity Performance: What Do We Know? Harris, Jenkinson, Kaplan · 2012 ↗ NBER What Do Private Equity Firms Say They Do? Gompers, Paul, Steven N. Kaplan, and Vladimir Mukharlyamov · 2015 ↗ NBER The Economic Effects of Private Equity Buyouts Davis, Steven J., John Haltiwanger, Josh Lerner, et al · 2020 ↗ Preqin Alternatives Allocations Stay High as More Family Offices Stick to Strategies 2024 ↗ Preqin Private Markets Research and Insights 2024 ↗ UBS Global Family Office Report 2024 2024 ↗Systemic Fractures · 33 sources
Atlantic Council Trade, Sanctions and Supply-Chain Analysis 2025 ↗ Atlantic Council Dollar Dominance Monitor 2025 ↗ BCRA The BCRA Sets the Crawling Peg at 1% per Month Banco Central de la Republica Argentina · 2025 ↗ BCRA International Reserves and Monetary Base Banco Central de la Republica Argentina · 2026 ↗ BCRA Now LELIQs Support Savings of Argentine Companies and Households Banco Central de la Republica Argentina · 2025 ↗ BCRA Deepening of the Monetary Aggregate Scheme: Re-Monetization Phase 2026 Banco Central de la Republica Argentina · 2025 ↗ BIS Annual Economic Report 2024 Bank for International Settlements · 2024 ↗ BIS Global supply chain disruptions: evolution, impact, outlook Igan, Rungcharoenkitkul and Takahashi · 2022 ↗ BIS Debt Securities Statistics Bank for International Settlements · 2026 ↗ BLS Consumer Price Index News Release U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics · 2026 ↗ Brookings The Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy 2026 ↗ CBO Monthly Budget Review: Summary for Fiscal Year 2025 Congressional Budget Office · 2025 ↗ CBO The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2026 to 2036 Congressional Budget Office · 2026 ↗ CRFB US Budget and Debt Analysis Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget · 2026 ↗ ESTADISTICASBCRA Argentina International Reserves Estadisticas BCRA · 2026 ↗ FOOL The Magnificent Seven's Market Cap vs. the S&P 500 2026 ↗ FSB FSB Publications: Vulnerability and Financial-System Reports Financial Stability Board · 2026 ↗ Federal Reserve Financial Stability Report 2025 ↗ Federal Reserve FOMC Meeting Calendars and Statements 2026 ↗ HISTORY Nixon and the End of the Bretton Woods System, 1971-1973 (Nixon Shock) US Department of State, Office of the Historian · 2013 ↗ IDEAS Inflation Hedging for Long-Term Investors Roache, Shaun K., and Alexander P. Attie · 2009 ↗ IEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025 International Energy Agency · 2025 ↗ IMF Global Financial Stability Report 2025 ↗ IMF 2025 External Sector Report: Global Imbalances in a Shifting World 2025 ↗ IMF Currency Composition of Official Foreign Exchange Reserves (COFER) International Monetary Fund · 2026 ↗ PIIE Trade Policy and Protectionism Research Peterson Institute for International Economics · 2025 ↗ TICDATA Major Foreign Holders of Treasury Securities (Table 5) U.S. Department of the Treasury · 2026 ↗ WGC Central Bank Gold Reserves Survey 2025 World Gold Council · 2025 ↗ WGC Gold Demand Trends Full Year 2024: Central Banks World Gold Council · 2025 ↗ WGC Gold Reserves by Country World Gold Council · 2026 ↗ WGC Gold Demand Trends World Gold Council · 2026 ↗ World Bank Argentina Overview: Development News, Research, Data 2026 ↗ multpl Shiller PE Ratio (CAPE) for the S&P 500 Robert Shiller · 2026 ↗Regional & Macro · 29 sources
Atlantic Council Going for Gold: Does the Dollar's Declining Share in Global Reserves Matter? Tran, Hung · 2024 ↗ BCRA Estadísticas e indicadores monetarios y del sector externo 2025 ↗ BIS Annual Economic Report 2025 Bank for International Settlements · 2025 ↗ Brookings Is the Global Financial System Fracturing Under Geopolitical Pressure? Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria, and David Wessel · 2025 ↗ CFR How to Pandemic-Proof Globalization O'Neil, Shannon K · 2020 ↗ ECLAC Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean: Productive Development and Inequality Research 2026 ↗ Gob. Argentina Resultado fiscal del Sector Público Nacional Ministerio de Economía · 2025 ↗ HOOVER Economic Policy Working Group 2026 ↗ IDB IDB Research and Data: SME Finance and Productivity in Latin America Inter-American Development Bank · 2026 ↗ IDEAS Employment Stabilization Inside Firms: An Empirical Investigation of Worker Cooperatives Navarra, Cecilia · 2016 ↗ IEA World Energy Outlook 2025: Executive Summary International Energy Agency · 2025 ↗ IMF Argentina: First Review Under the Extended Arrangement Under the Extended Fund Facility 2025 ↗ IMF Argentina and the IMF 2025 ↗ IMF IMF Executive Board Approves 48-month US$20 billion Extended Arrangement for Argentina 2025 ↗ IMF Argentina: IMF Country Page and Article IV Consultation International Monetary Fund · 2026 ↗ INDEC Índice de precios al consumidor (IPC) 2025 ↗ INDEC Estimador mensual de actividad económica (EMAE) 2025 ↗ INDEC Incidencia de la pobreza y la indigencia en 31 aglomerados urbanos, primer semestre de 2024 2024 ↗ NBER Finance and Growth: Theory and Evidence Levine, Ross · 2004 ↗ NBER The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States Autor, David H., David Dorn, and Gordon H. Hanson · 2012 ↗ NBER Macroeconomics National Bureau of Economic Research · 2026 ↗ OECD Enhancing Productivity and Growth in an Ageing Society 2024 ↗ OURWORLDINDATA Gross Public Sector Debt as a Share of Gross Domestic Product Our World in Data · 2025 ↗ OURWORLDINDATA Old-Age Dependency Ratio Our World in Data · 2024 ↗ UTDT Department of Economics: Argentine Macroeconomic and Financial Research Universidad Torcuato Di Tella · 2026 ↗ WID World Inequality Report 2022 Chancel, Lucas, Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman · 2022 ↗ World Bank Argentina Country Overview 2025 ↗ World Bank Domestic Credit to Private Sector (% of GDP), Argentina (FS.AST.PRVT.GD.ZS) 2024 ↗ World Bank Manufacturing, Value Added (current US$), China 2024 ↗Institutional Due Diligence
The complete evidence base, every source annotated by tenet and mapped to the Perspectives that cite it, is available to qualified institutional reviewers in the Institutional Due-Diligence Portal.
Doctrine Library Cross-Reference
Doctrine Essays Drawing on This Research
These institutional perspectives apply the research above to The SAVI Capital Model framework. Click through to see how each tenet's evidence base shapes the firm's investment doctrine.
Foundation — The Capital Model & Platforms
- The SAVI Capital Model: A Four-Tenet Framework for Equitable Private Equity
- Qualified Purchaser vs Accredited Investor: A Practical Guide for Private Equity Allocators
- The SAVI Capital Partners Mandate
- The Business Case for Alitheia
- Alitheia and the Intelligence Alpha
- Proprietary Capital Infrastructure
- Sylvanus AI